{"id":2222,"date":"2015-03-23T10:41:05","date_gmt":"2015-03-23T10:41:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/charisma.local\/charisma2023\/char1smaSSL\/?post_type=consumption&#038;p=2222"},"modified":"2025-09-27T23:45:46","modified_gmt":"2025-09-27T22:45:46","slug":"marketplace-icons-a-new-series-in-consumption-markets-culture","status":"publish","type":"consumption","link":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/consumption\/marketplace-icons-a-new-series-in-consumption-markets-culture","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Marketplace Icons&#8217; &#8211; a new series in Consumption Markets &#038; Culture"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I am pleased to introduce a new series of articles from Consumption Markets &amp; Culture &#8211; &#8220;Marketplace Icons.&#8221; The first, &#8220;Denim&#8221; by Daniel Miller is available here:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/10253866.2015.1008193#abstract\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/<wbr \/>doi\/full\/10.1080\/10253866.<wbr \/>2015.1008193#abstract<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Denim is an ideal object for thinking about marketplace icons more generally because it transcends the very notion. The term \u201cmarketplace icon\u201d suggests there is something specific, a brand, an object, which captures you precisely because of its specificity. Now, denim is not that at all. Denim is ubiquitous, it is ordinary, and actually many of the people I studied who wear denim often do not even know what brand it is.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jonathan Schroeder introduces the new &#8216;Marketplace Icon&#8217; series in the journal Consumption Markets &#038; Culture. The first is &#8216;Denim&#8217;, by Daniel Miller <a href=\"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/consumption\/marketplace-icons-a-new-series-in-consumption-markets-culture\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"morelink\">Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":58,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,15],"tags":[433,361,1067],"class_list":["post-2222","consumption","type-consumption","status-publish","hentry","category-all","category-announcements","tag-consumption-markets-and-culture","tag-daniel-miller","tag-denim"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/consumption\/2222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/consumption"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/consumption"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/58"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2222"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/consumption\/2222\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2947,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/consumption\/2222\/revisions\/2947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}