{"id":2082,"date":"2014-04-23T12:41:48","date_gmt":"2014-04-23T11:41:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/charisma.local\/charisma2023\/char1smaSSL\/?post_type=markets&#038;p=2082"},"modified":"2014-04-23T12:41:48","modified_gmt":"2014-04-23T11:41:48","slug":"marketing-theory-special-issue-on-market-systems","status":"publish","type":"markets","link":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/markets\/marketing-theory-special-issue-on-market-systems","title":{"rendered":"Marketing Theory Special Issue on Market Systems"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-block-type=\"2\">\n<h6>Guest Editors:\u00a0Markus Giesler &amp;\u00a0Eileen Fischer<\/h6>\n<h6>Deadline for full paper submission:\u00a0April 15, 2015<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<div data-block-type=\"47\">\n<div>\n<hr \/>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div data-block-type=\"2\">\n<div>\n<p>In recent attempts to expand the understanding of marketing and consumption, researchers have moved beyond traditional consumer-centric analytical modes and have instead begun to draw on a number of systems-level sociological, anthropological, institutional, and historical approaches. This so-called market systems approach (Giesler 2003) has several theoretical benefits. It can inform multiple critical marketing debates by raising \u201cawareness of the critical, ethical, social and methodological issues facing contemporary marketing\u201d (Saren et al. 2007).\u00a0\u00a0It can offer new avenues for investigating what Askegaard and Linnet (2011) have recently described as \u201cthe context of context\u201d in which marketing operates by foregrounding the \u201cpatterns of performed relationships between objects, individuals, and institutions that provide meanings to material practice and order economic life\u201d (Giesler 2012). And finally, it can help resolve a number of issues on the rise and of interest to consumer culture theorists by developing \u201can important direction [\u2026] not captured in [Arnould and Thompson\u2019s (2007)] fourfold theoretics\u201d (Arnould 2011).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div data-block-type=\"47\">\n<div>\n<hr \/>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div data-block-type=\"2\">\n<div>\n<h6>PURPOSE\u00a0&amp; TOPICS<\/h6>\n<p>This special issue seeks to add to and expand the growing body of research on market systems (e.g., Giesler 2003, 2006, 2008, 2012; Kjeldgaard and Askegaard 2006; Venkatesh and Pe\u00f1aloza 2006; Thompson and Coskuner-Balli 2007; Humphreys 2010 a and b; Sandikci and Ger 2010; Karababa and Ger 2011; Press and Arnould 2011; Scaraboto and Fischer 2013; Bjerrisgaard and Kjeldgaard 2012; Siebert and Thyroff 2013). Specifically, we invite theoretical and empirical analyses on the systems level that focus on key topics in marketing and consumption in ways that extend, complement, and critique existing consumer-centric investigations. Possible research topics include, but are not limited to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>brands,<\/li>\n<li>value co-creation,<\/li>\n<li>technology consumption,<\/li>\n<li>gift giving,<\/li>\n<li>consumption history,<\/li>\n<li>emotions,<\/li>\n<li>space,<\/li>\n<li>political economy of consumption,<\/li>\n<li>consumer acculturation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div data-block-type=\"47\">\n<div>\n<hr \/>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div data-block-type=\"2\">\n<div>\n<h6>SUBMISSIONS<\/h6>\n<p>All submissions will be reviewed in accordance with the process outlined in the Manuscript Submission Guidelines on the\u00a0<em>Marketing Theory\u00a0<\/em>Homepage. The journal home page and author guidelines may be accessed at:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/intl-mtq.sagepub.com\/\">http:\/\/intl-mtq.sagepub.com<\/a>. The contribution of the paper should be clearly stated in the abstract and should be in accordance with the special issue theme. To give authors enough time to produce their high-quality theoretical and empirical contributions, the issue is slated for publication in 2017.\u00a0Submissions and any questions should be sent directly to the co-editors of the special issue.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div data-block-type=\"47\">\n<div>\n<hr \/>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div data-block-type=\"2\">\n<div>\n<h6>REFERENCES<\/h6>\n<p>Arnould, Eric J. (2011), \u201cConsumer Culture Theory Group, July 28\u201d\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/groups\/213134458706536\/\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/groups\/213134458706536\/\">https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/groups\/213134458706536\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>____________ and Craig J. Thompson (2007), \u201cConsumer Culture Theory (and We\u00a0Really Mean Theoretics): Dilemmas and Opportunities Posed by an Academic Branding Strategy,\u201d In\u00a0<em>Consumer Culture Theory<\/em>, Vol. 11 of Research in\u00a0Consumer Behavior, eds. Russell Belk and\u00a0John F. Sherry, Jr., Oxford, UK:\u00a0Elsevier, 3-22.<\/p>\n<p>Askegaard, S\u00f8ren and Jeppe Trolle Linnet \u00a0(2011), &#8220;Towards an Epistemology of Consumer Culture Theory: Phenomenology and the Context of Context,&#8221;\u00a0<em>Marketing Theory<\/em>, 11 (4), 381-404.<\/p>\n<p>Bjerrisgaard, S.M. and Kjeldgaard, D. (2012), \u201cHow Market Research Shapes Market\u00a0Spatiality: A Global Governmentality Perspective,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Macromarketing.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Giesler, Markus (2003), \u201cSocial Systems in Marketing\u201d, in\u00a0<em>European Advances in\u00a0<\/em><em>Consumer Research<\/em>,\u00a0Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 6, 249-256.<\/p>\n<p>____________ (2006), \u201cConsumer Gift Systems,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Research<\/em>, 33\u00a0(September), 283-290.<\/p>\n<p>____________ (2008), \u201cConflict and Compromise: Drama in Marketplace\u00a0Evolution,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Research<\/em>, 34 (April), 739-753.<\/p>\n<p>____________ (2012), \u201cHow Doppelg\u00e4nger Brand Images Influence the Market Creation Process: Longitudinal Insights from the Rise of Botox Cosmetic,\u00a0<em>Journal of Marketing<\/em>, 76 (November), 55-68.<\/p>\n<p>Humphreys, Ashlee (2010a), \u201cMegamarketing: The Creation of Markets as a Social\u00a0Process,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Marketing<\/em>, 74 (March), 1\u201319.<\/p>\n<p>____________ (2010b), \u201cSemiotic Structure and the Legitimation of Consumption\u00a0Practices: The Case of Casino Gambling,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Research<\/em>, 37\u00a0(October), 490\u2013510.<\/p>\n<p>Karababa, Emineg\u00fcl and G\u00fcliz Ger (2011), \u201cEarly Modern Ottoman Coffeehouse Culture\u00a0and the Formation of the Consumer Subject,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Research<\/em>, 37, 5, 737\u2013760.<\/p>\n<p>Kjeldgaard, Dannie and S\u00f8ren Askegaard (2006), \u201cThe Glocalization of Youth Culture:\u00a0The Global Youth Segment as Structures of Common Difference,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Research<\/em>, 33 (September), 231-247.<\/p>\n<p>Press, Melea and Eric J. Arnould (2011), \u201cLegitimating community supported agriculture\u00a0through American pastoralist ideology,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Culture,\u00a0<\/em>11, 2, 168\u2013194.<\/p>\n<p>Sandikci, \u00d6zlem and G\u00fcliz Ger (2010), \u201cVeiling in Style: How Does a Stigmatized\u00a0Practice Become Fashionable?\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Research, 37<\/em>\u00a0(June), 15-36.<\/p>\n<p>Saren, Michael, Pauline Maclaran, Christina Goulding, Richard Elliott, Avi Shankar, and Miriam Catterall (2007),\u00a0<em>Critical Marketing: Defining the Field<\/em>, Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.<\/p>\n<p>Scaraboto, Daiane and Eileen Fischer (2013), \u201cFrustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional\u00a0Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream\u00a0Markets,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Research<\/em>,\u00a0Vol. 39, No. 6 (April 2013), pp. 1234-1257.<\/p>\n<p>Siebert, Anton and Anastasia Thyroff (2013), \u201cMarket System Dynamics: The value of,\u00a0and the open questions associated with, studying markets in consumer culture theory,\u201d\u00a0Proceedings of the 2012 Association for Consumer Research\u00a0Conference\u00a0(Vancouver, BC, October 4-7).<\/p>\n<p>Thompson, Craig J. and Gokcen Coskuner-Balli (2007), \u201cCountervailing Market\u00a0Responses to Corporate Co-optation and the Ideological Recruitment of\u00a0Consumption Communities,\u201d\u00a0<em>Journal of Consumer Research<\/em>, 34 (August), 135\u2013151.<\/p>\n<p>Venkatesh, Alladi and Lisa Pe\u00f1aloza, (2006), \u201cFrom Marketing to Markets: A Call for\u00a0Paradigm Shift,\u201d in\u00a0<em>Does Marketing Need Reform? Fresh Perspectives on the Future,\u00a0<\/em>eds. Jagdish N. Sheth and Rajendra S. Sisodia, Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 134-150.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A call for papers for a special issue of Marketing Theory on market systems edited by Markus Giesler and Eileen Fischer. Deadline for full papers April 2015 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/markets\/marketing-theory-special-issue-on-market-systems\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"morelink\">Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":72,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,15],"tags":[410,277,862,867,865,864,863,861,297,866,305,259],"class_list":["post-2082","markets","type-markets","status-publish","hentry","category-all","category-announcements","tag-brands","tag-consumption","tag-eileen-fischer","tag-emotions","tag-gift-giving","tag-market-systems","tag-marketing-theory","tag-markus-giesler","tag-political-economy","tag-space","tag-special-issue","tag-value"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/markets\/2082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/markets"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/markets"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/72"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2082"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/markets\/2082\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2083,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/markets\/2082\/revisions\/2083"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}