{"id":2353,"date":"2016-10-19T12:07:06","date_gmt":"2016-10-19T11:07:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/charisma.local\/charisma2023\/char1smaSSL\/?post_type=markets&p=2353"},"modified":"2025-09-27T23:46:26","modified_gmt":"2025-09-27T22:46:26","slug":"2353","status":"publish","type":"markets","link":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/markets\/2353","title":{"rendered":"New Economic Sociology and Sociology: Where Do They Meet? Where Do They Diverge?"},"content":{"rendered":"

CfP: New Economic Sociology and Sociology: Where Do They Meet? Where Do They Diverge?\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Workshops: Bringing The New Economic Sociology Back Into the Sociological Analysis<\/h3>\n

Warsaw, 22-23 May 2017<\/h3>\n

<\/h3>\n

Economic sociology got established as an approach to economic phenomena with the tools of sociology. This was relaunched in the 1980s in close association with the thesis of social embeddedness of economic action, and it continues to flourish and develop ever since. Hence, the embeddedness theoretical foundation was supplemented with other strong assumptions regarding power, institutions, social networks, as well as uncertainty, unintended consequences and fictional expectations. While, in addition to the US branch of new economic sociology, other related schools soon came along, such as the distinct European platforms.<\/p>\n

The sociological dimension of new economic sociology notwithstanding, it is also observable, especially in the case of the generic European approach, that this is rather loosely coupled with sociology. New economic sociology makes use of sociological concepts and theories in addressing economic phenomena. But it directs this framing mainly towards economics,\u00a0theory\u00a0of organizations, new institutionalism and the study of social networks. This brings a sociological or sociologically informed perspective on economic phenomena to the attention of these disciplines. Yet it rarely uses insights gained by new economic sociology in order to build a bridge to, reinterpret or update the traditional or contemporary sociological framings. This state of affairs leads to the situation that even though new economic sociology builds on sociology, and it is presented as a sub-field of it, this also runs the risk of diverting from sociology, and of becoming a new sociology altogether.<\/p>\n

In line with these observable trends, the Workshop aims to inquire whether this trend towards loose\u00a0coupling,\u00a0and even decoupling, is universal or rather particular to specific branches of new economic sociology? What elements determine whether new economic sociology and sociology appear as more or less coupled\/decoupled? How is the tricky relation between new economic sociology and sociology probable to develop? What can sociology learn from new economic sociology? How to bring new economic sociology back into the sociological explanations?<\/p>\n

The Workshop invites papers related to the following themes:<\/p>\n

\u2013 New economic sociology and sociology \u2013 the anatomy and prospects of a complex relation;<\/p>\n

\u2013 New economic sociology and other disciplines;<\/p>\n

\u2013 Various branches of new economic sociology and their level of institutionalization as sub-fields of sociology;<\/p>\n

\u2013 Theoretical foundations and new insights in new economic sociology ;<\/p>\n

\u2013 Strategic research sights in new economic sociology and the sociological underpinnings of these;<\/p>\n

\u2013 Sociological problems and their treatment in new economic sociology;<\/p>\n

\u2013 Cumulative knowledge of sociological approaches to economic phenomena in new economic sociology.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Guest-speakers<\/h3>\n

Patrik Aspers<\/a>\u00a0(Uppsala University \u2013\u00a0Department of Sociology)<\/p>\n

Andrzej Rychard<\/a>\u00a0(Polish Academy of Sciences \u2013 Institute of Philosophy and Sociology)<\/p>\n

Deadlines<\/h3>\n

Submission of extended abstract \u2013 1,000 words (to Adriana Mica, a.mica@uw.edu.pl): 10 December 2016<\/p>\n

Notification of acceptance: 10 January 2017<\/p>\n

Submission of full papers: 2 May 2017.<\/p>\n

Registration<\/h3>\n

Membership fee (Polish Sociological Association, in good standing): 110 Euro<\/p>\n

Non-membership fee: 130 Euro<\/p>\n

The conference fee covers lunch breaks, conference dinner in the evening of the first day of the conference.<\/p>\n

Organizing Institutions<\/h3>\n

Polish Sociological Association \u2013 Section of Economic Sociology & Warsaw Department<\/p>\n

Polish Academy of Sciences \u2013 Institute of Philosophy and Sociology<\/p>\n

University of Warsaw \u2013\u00a0Faculty of Applied Social Sciences and Resocialization<\/p>\n

Contact \/\u00a0Organizers<\/h3>\n

Mateusz Halawa<\/a>\u00a0(Polish Academy of Sciences \u2013 Institute of Philosophy and Sociology; School of Form; New School for Social Research in New York): halam023@icloud.com<\/p>\n

Adriana Mica<\/a>\u00a0(University of Warsaw \u2013 Faculty of Applied Social Sciences and Resocialization):\u00a0a.mica@uw.edu.pl<\/p>\n

Marta Olco\u0144-Kubicka<\/a>\u00a0(Polish Academy of Sciences \u2013 Institute of Philosophy and Sociology): molcon-kubicka@ifispan.waw.pl.<\/p>\n

Katarzyna M. Wyrzykowska<\/a>\u00a0(Polish Sociological Association): katarzyna@wyrzykowska.net<\/p>\n

Author of Poster<\/h3>\n

Ioana Mica: mica_ioana@yahoo.com.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Call for papers for workshop in Warsaw in May 2017, featuring guest speakers Patrik Aspers and Andrzej Rychard. The event is titled ‘New Economic Sociology and Sociology: Where Do They Meet? Where Do They Diverge?’. Deadline for Abstracts: December 10. Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,15],"tags":[1016,1237,1171,325],"class_list":["post-2353","markets","type-markets","status-publish","hentry","category-all","category-announcements","tag-new-economic-sociology","tag-patrick-aspers","tag-warsaw","tag-workshop"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/markets\/2353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/markets"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/markets"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2353"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/markets\/2353\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3990,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/markets\/2353\/revisions\/3990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.journalofculturaleconomy.org\/charisma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}